Vs > Lower Hutt, Gracefield
 | Sao Paulo vs Lower Hutt, Gracefield Climate & Distance Between |  |
Sao Paulo vs Changdu, China
Sao Paulo vs Kerch, Russia
Sao Paulo vs Kanazawa, Japan
Sao Paulo vs Columbia, Mo, Usa
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs El Dorado, Ks, Usa
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Tsuyama, Japan
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Sennar, Sudan
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Lamar, Mo, Usa
Jacobina vs Nord
Itaituba vs Forrest
Luxemburg City vs Alice Springs, Northern Territory
Moundou vs Ho Chi Minh
- The distance between Sao Paulo, Brazil and Lower Hutt, Gracefield, New Zealand is approximately 11,641 km or 7,234 mi.
- To reach Sao Paulo in this distance one would set out from Lower Hutt, Gracefield bearing 141.1° or SE
 and follow the great circles arc to approach Sao Paulo bearing 31° or NNE .
- Sao Paulo has a humid subtropical climate (Cfa) whereas Lower Hutt, Gracefield has a marine west coast climate (Cfb).
- Sao Paulo is in or near the subtropical moist forest biome whereas Lower Hutt, Gracefield is in or near the warm temperate thorn steppe biome.
- The annual mean temperature is 6.2 °C (11.2°F) warmer.
- Average monthly temperatures vary by 2 °C (3.6°F) less in Sao Paulo. The continentality subtype is truly hyperoceanic as opposed to barely hyperoceanic.
- Total annual precipitation averages 139.2 mm (5.5 in) more which is equivalent to 139.2 l/m² (3.42 US gal/ft²) or 1,392,000 l/ha (148,814 US gal/ac) more. About 1 1/9 as much.
- The altitude of the sun at midday is overall 17.5° higher in Sao Paulo than in Lower Hutt, Gracefield.
Climate Comparison Table
The table shows values for Sao Paulo relative to Lower Hutt, Gracefield. You can also view this comparison the other way around from the perspective of Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Sao Paulo.
| | |
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
Annual |
 | Average Temperature °C ( °F) |
+5 (+9) |
+5 (+9) |
+5 (+10) |
+6 (+10) |
+6 (+11) |
+7 (+12) |
+7 (+13) |
+8 (+14) |
+7 (+12) |
+7 (+12) |
+6 (+11) |
+5 (+9) |
|
+6 (+11) |
 | Average Precipitation mm (in) |
+165 (+6) |
+156 (+6) |
+67 (+3) |
-36 (-1) |
-63 (-2) |
-86 (-3) |
-114 (-4) |
-101 (-4) |
-34 (-1) |
+25 (+1) |
+58 (+2) |
+101 (+4) |
|
+139 (+5) |
 | Average Daylight Hours & Minutes/ Day |
-1h 19' |
-0h 49' |
-0h 08' |
+0h 33' |
+1h 10' |
+1h 29' |
+1h 21' |
+0h 49' |
+0h 07' |
-0h 34' |
-1h 11' |
-1h 29' |
|
0h 00' |
 | Sun altitude at solar noon on the 21st day (°) |
+16.9 |
+17.2 |
+17.5 |
+17.5 |
+17.6 |
+17.7 |
+17.8 |
+17.9 |
+17.9 |
+17.6 |
+16.8 |
+17.4 |
| +17.5 |
There are so many comparison pages. Please post a link to one to help people find them:
Sao Paulo vs Val D’Or, Quebec, Canada
Sao Paulo vs London-Gatwick, Uk
Sao Paulo vs Dalanzadgad, Mongolia
Sao Paulo vs Fannaråki/ Fanaråken, Sogn Og Fjordane, Norway
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Algona, Ia, Usa
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Las Gaviotas, Colombia
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Spokane, Wa, Usa
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Pituffik/ Thule Air Base, Greenland
Oakland, Md vs Zahedan
Erlian vs Mt Pleasant
Hoyvík/ Tórshavn vs Lynn Lake, Manitoba
Udon Thani vs Diamantino
Sao Paulo vs Lower Hutt, Gracefield Discussion
You are welcome to incorporate your thoughts on the differences in climate or other matters such as contrasts in culture, standard of living, demographics etc.
|
This site may contain signs of a lockdown.
